Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Little Book Series 3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • dannyboy121070
    replied
    I had to make myself stop counting at eight, and remind myself that I'm not getting paid to proof this book, so stop stressing and just try to enjoy it.

    I prefer these cloth covers, but I can see how a switch in materials in an ongoing book series would set off collector's OD in some people. The changes in limitations bothered me more that the cover material. I do still enjoy the LITTLE BOOK series, I just wish Borderlands took a more care in the presentation of their products.

    Leave a comment:


  • goathunter
    replied
    Originally posted by RonClinton View Post

    Great. If the limitation issues and the switch to the bland cloth covers weren’t enough, this chronic typo/layout issue may cause this third set to be my last (and I’ve collected all three sets, from the very beginning). We’ll see, but it sure is getting tiresome.
    I haven't gone through it with a fine-toothed comb, but I'm only aware of four minor layout issues in the McCammon book. As one of the people who helped with the book, I'm embarrassed that I missed any. But I don't think the book is rife with errors. Others may have been, but this one is not.

    I personally think the cloth cover looks a lot nice than the vinyl covers of previous books, which just looked like cheap vinyl to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • RonClinton
    replied
    Originally posted by dannyboy121070 View Post
    The usual Borderlands typos and editing and layout errors were in full effect.
    Great. If the limitation issues and the switch to the bland cloth covers weren’t enough, this chronic typo/layout issue may cause this third set to be my last (and I’ve collected all three sets, from the very beginning). We’ll see, but it sure is getting tiresome.

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    Originally posted by dannyboy121070 View Post
    I read the McCammon today, and was slightly underwhelmed, probably because I set the bar so high for him. The first story was a good ghost story, the 2nd was weird, but well-written, and I skipped the third, since I read the story digitally a few months ago on McCammon's website. The usual Borderlands typos and editing and layout errors were in full effect.
    Typos and layout errors are the Borderlands signature.

    Leave a comment:


  • dannyboy121070
    replied
    I read the McCammon today, and was slightly underwhelmed, probably because I set the bar so high for him. The first story was a good ghost story, the 2nd was weird, but well-written, and I skipped the third, since I read the story digitally a few months ago on McCammon's website. The usual Borderlands typos and editing and layout errors were in full effect.

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    Originally posted by dannyboy121070 View Post
    That Campbell was a chore to read. I kept going out of spite. (Spiting myself for spending thirty bucks on a childhood trunk novel fragment, I guess...but spite nonetheless!)
    I knew I had seen some negative views but could not remember from where. I will get to that and the McCammon little books soon

    Leave a comment:


  • dannyboy121070
    replied
    That Campbell was a chore to read. I kept going out of spite. (Spiting myself for spending thirty bucks on a childhood trunk novel fragment, I guess...but spite nonetheless!)

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    I remember this conversation now and realize I do have the Campbell book. Have not read it yet though. Mine has the 350 page limitation variant.

    Leave a comment:


  • jeffingoff
    replied
    Originally posted by RonClinton View Post
    I just received my copies of the two newest LITTLE BOOKS, and perhaps we already addressed this earlier, but the limitation of the Campbell is back to the 350-limitation and the McCammon has a 750-limitation...I remembered the McCammon was going to be larger, but I was surprised to see the Campbell still at 350 as I thought I recalled that they'd jacked up the limitation to 500...kinda figured, I guess, that they would have done away with the 350 base + 150 extra and just gone 500 for the Campbell (and forthcoming volumes)...then perhaps go 500 base + 250 extra for the McCammon. Now there are all sorts of different official and unofficial limitations...would've been nice to see it standardized somehow.
    Yeah as MG stated, Campbell must have signed 350 sheets at the very outset of series 3. Then Tom bumped the run back up to 500 so two limitation pages were created for that volume. The original 350 and the somewhat rarer 500.

    Now that I think about it, I wonder if Tom initially set the run at 350 when he was hoping to get a King book. Maybe King agreed to only sign that amount or Tom was hoping the lower run would help him get a commitment and then when the deal with King didn't solidy, Tom just boosted the run.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marmaduke Grigsby
    replied
    Originally posted by RonClinton View Post
    I just received my copies of the two newest LITTLE BOOKS, and perhaps we already addressed this earlier, but the limitation of the Campbell is back to the 350-limitation and the McCammon has a 750-limitation...I remembered the McCammon was going to be larger, but I was surprised to see the Campbell still at 350 as I thought I recalled that they'd jacked up the limitation to 500...kinda figured, I guess, that they would have done away with the 350 base + 150 extra and just gone 500 for the Campbell (and forthcoming volumes)...then perhaps go 500 base + 250 extra for the McCammon. Now there are all sorts of different official and unofficial limitations...would've been nice to see it standardized somehow.
    The Campbell volume was increased to 500 after the initial 350 signature sheets were signed. :-)

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    Originally posted by RonClinton View Post
    I just received my copies of the two newest LITTLE BOOKS, and perhaps we already addressed this earlier, but the limitation of the Campbell is back to the 350-limitation and the McCammon has a 750-limitation...I remembered the McCammon was going to be larger, but I was surprised to see the Campbell still at 350 as I thought I recalled that they'd jacked up the limitation to 500...kinda figured, I guess, that they would have done away with the 350 base + 150 extra and just gone 500 for the Campbell (and forthcoming volumes)...then perhaps go 500 base + 250 extra for the McCammon. Now there are all sorts of different official and unofficial limitations...would've been nice to see it standardized somehow.
    Do not have my Campbell book yet but unfortunately I am not surprised. I really like this series but it feels like Borderlands is trying to make me not want to collect them.

    Leave a comment:


  • RonClinton
    replied
    I just received my copies of the two newest LITTLE BOOKS, and perhaps we already addressed this earlier, but the limitation of the Campbell is back to the 350-limitation and the McCammon has a 750-limitation...I remembered the McCammon was going to be larger, but I was surprised to see the Campbell still at 350 as I thought I recalled that they'd jacked up the limitation to 500...kinda figured, I guess, that they would have done away with the 350 base + 150 extra and just gone 500 for the Campbell (and forthcoming volumes)...then perhaps go 500 base + 250 extra for the McCammon. Now there are all sorts of different official and unofficial limitations...would've been nice to see it standardized somehow.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sock Monkey
    replied
    Agreed. My money is on a King book, but one signed by the editor and not the author.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brian861
    replied
    Originally posted by Sock Monkey View Post
    I think with the announcement of the Sarah Pinborough book we can pretty much write off Stephen King in Series III. I'm beginning to wonder how many of Little Books Borderlands has in the pipeline as there was even a hint of a Pinborough title until this announcement. It might be that Borderlands has a bunch of these titles lined up and is putting them out depending on when each title is completed. To keep Jeff's dream alive, it may be possible that there is a King book in the works, but it might keep getting delayed due to various reasons.
    I honestly don't think King is up to signing 500 to 750 copies. He only signed 250 copies of If It Bleeds.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sock Monkey
    replied
    I think with the announcement of the Sarah Pinborough book we can pretty much write off Stephen King in Series III. I'm beginning to wonder how many of Little Books Borderlands has in the pipeline as there was even a hint of a Pinborough title until this announcement. It might be that Borderlands has a bunch of these titles lined up and is putting them out depending on when each title is completed. To keep Jeff's dream alive, it may be possible that there is a King book in the works, but it might keep getting delayed due to various reasons.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X