Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rate the Last Movie You Saw

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • brlesh
    replied
    Originally posted by Brian861 View Post

    Wow, Tommy! I stated I was bored with the film and was bummed since I had wanted to see it so badly. Your review actually makes me enjoy the film so much better without another watch. Thank you for opening my eyes to what was right in front of my face. Clearly, I wasn't qualified to view it lol.
    Yeah, I’ve got to agree, you got a lot more out of it than I did!

    Guess I need to cut down on the vodka I sneak into the movies.

    Good points - the cinematography & sound we’re very good.
    NOPE is definitely a movie that needs to be seen in the theater, IMO, if you are going to see it.

    The acting was good, especially the actors that played the brother & sister. Angel provided some well timed comic relief, and it was good to see Michael Wincott working again.

    Lesser points - I was just kind of underwhelmed with the story. Maybe my expectations were too high going in, but I was just expecting more from the storyline.

    One question, if any body can answer it: what was up with the vertical slipper/shoe in the Gordy scene?

    B

    Leave a comment:


  • Brian861
    replied
    Originally posted by Tommy View Post
    I saw it again this weekend because we couldn't decide what to see. I want to see Maverick but he wanted to see the dinosaur movie again for the sixth time so we saw NOPE (Not Of Planet Earth) again. I enjoyed it more the second watch. The Word spectacle is the key to that film.
    Spoiler!


    Of course this is all supposition on my part but that is what I see and I did feel like a second watch helped tremendously.
    Wow, Tommy! I stated I was bored with the film and was bummed since I had wanted to see it so badly. Your review actually makes me enjoy the film so much better without another watch. Thank you for opening my eyes to what was right in front of my face. Clearly, I wasn't qualified to view it lol.

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    Sorry to hear that. There is a very good chance I will go see it again before it leaves the theater.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tommy
    replied
    Where the Crawdads Sing isn't playing near here. Figures.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tommy
    replied
    And I get that every director is not going to be for every person. That's just life! Peele does get more ambitious with each project and I like the idea that his films can be seen as "Popcorn movies" but also as almost arthouse films with deep underlying sociopolitical messages.

    Men was a film I liked earlier this year but it was no Popcorn Movie. It was straight metaphor storytelling throughout the whole thing. Made it more intense and it's not a film you have fun watching, you gotta think.

    Peele's films, to me, can be taken both ways and I always admire a layered (especially horror) film.

    And again, not saying that anyone that doesn't like his work isn't thinking hard enough or something insulting like that, far from it. I am at the point where I see patterns that aren't there sometimes from having seen so many films in my life. I immediately start analyzing on a second watch if I like the film. At one point I wanted to be a film critic but you see how terrible I am at it, HA!

    Just another ramblin' stranger on the interwebs....

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    Originally posted by Tommy View Post
    Thanks Martin and fair enough. I am not sure if I was trying to convince anyone about the movie's overall "goodness". I was sharing my thoughts after a second analytic look at the movie. I hope I didn't offend. I respect you way too much to try and strong arm you into liking a film. You are the nicest person I've met through various forums and I consider it an honor that you speak to me at all.
    I certainly took no offense. I read it as you providing your thoughts on a movie you really enjoyed. In retrospect I see several of the points you make, which was interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tommy
    replied
    Thanks Martin and fair enough. I am not sure if I was trying to convince anyone about the movie's overall "goodness". I was sharing my thoughts after a second analytic look at the movie. I hope I didn't offend. I respect you way too much to try and strong arm you into liking a film. You are the nicest person I've met through various forums and I consider it an honor that you speak to me at all.

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    Tommy. I thoroughly enjoyed and see the points in your analysis of NOPE. I would have enjoyed those things if I had been able to watch without checking my watch every few minutes to see how soon I would be released. A second watch will not help me as I am unwilling to try. I have yet to see Maverick but may try it soon. At the moment Where the Crawdads sing is calling me back for a second watch,

    Leave a comment:


  • Tommy
    replied
    I saw it again this weekend because we couldn't decide what to see. I want to see Maverick but he wanted to see the dinosaur movie again for the sixth time so we saw NOPE (Not Of Planet Earth) again. I enjoyed it more the second watch. The Word spectacle is the key to that film.
    Spoiler!


    Of course this is all supposition on my part but that is what I see and I did feel like a second watch helped tremendously.

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    Originally posted by Tommy View Post

    Understood. The pacing is possibly a result of it being edited down from a much longer cut.
    That is possible but based on the two movies I have seen from him I suspect it is a stylistic choice.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tommy
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin View Post

    Just to clarify. I do not think it ran too long. I think the pacing in the show was too slow. I had the same issue with Get Out. I think the pacing is done by choice; it just does not work for me.
    Understood. The pacing is possibly a result of it being edited down from a much longer cut.

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    Originally posted by Tommy View Post
    I've liked all his films but do see struggles in them. He hasn't exactly nailed the masterpiece yet but I think it's him. Also, funny that a lot of people think it ran too long when Peele said the original cut was actually three hours and forty-five minutes. That's a big edit!
    Just to clarify. I do not think it ran too long. I think the pacing in the show was too slow. I had the same issue with Get Out. I think the pacing is done by choice; it just does not work for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tommy
    replied
    I've liked all his films but do see struggles in them. He hasn't exactly nailed the masterpiece yet but I think it's him. Also, funny that a lot of people think it ran too long when Peele said the original cut was actually three hours and forty-five minutes. That's a big edit!

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    I watched Nope last night. My wife loved Get Out and had me watch it. I found that movie rather predictable but my real gripe with it was the pacing. it felt like a 30-minute show in a 2-hour movie. I skipped Us based on my thoughts on his first movie. As I am currently doing the AMC membership and the previews looked interesting, so I went to see Nope. I thought Nope was an original take on the alien movie. I thought the actors were good. Although the movie had some predictable elements they did not get in the way of the story. There were some visual effects done in the later stages of the movie that made no sense to the story as it was being told but hey, I am watching an alien movie so I can set that aside. The issue came from the pacing again. It also feels like a 30-show in a 2-hour movie. I liked Nope better than Get Out but I think Peele's story telling is not my thing.

    Side Note: Where The Crawdads Sing is a fantastic movie!

    Leave a comment:


  • Sock Monkey
    replied
    I'm a little mixed on Peele's films. I think that GET OUT was a solid movie, but I thought US was a mess. I don't get the hype. I think there are a lot more interesting horror directors out there right now including Mike Flanagan and David Bruckner. I plan on seeing NOPE when it's on Blu-ray, but I'm not incredibly excited.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X