Rate the Last Movie You Saw

[Sock Monkey]

I've been watching movies like crazy over the past few weeks...so many that I forgot some of them already. Highlights include:

THE BOYS IN THE BOAT, a fresh-from-theaters film directed by George Clooney about a Washington rowing team that made it to the Olympics in Hitler's Germany. Decent film, but if you've seen one sports biopic, you've seen this one. No surprises to be had at all.

NOSFERATU. THE VAMPYRE . Having just finished Werner Herzog's new autobiography, I felt compelled to seek out some Herzong/Kinski films. I was sure I had never seen this, but a lot of it seemed familiar...I think I saw it on Bravo back in the 90s, maybe. VERY slow and ponderous...I alternated being awestruck (Some of the lingering shots of scenery and countryside were just spectacular) and being bored by the odd pace. Kinski pales in comparison to Max Schreck, unfortunately, and this was not as good as the original. Isabelle Adjani's performance was silent-film worthy in it's dramatics. Weird film. Glad I watched it, but it bored me enough to postpone more Herzog/Kinski films for another night.

Not sure if I mentioned this in an earlier post, but I finally watched THE GRAY MAN on Netflix. Fun action film with Ryan Gosling, and Chris Evans in a rare villain role. Action-packed, good performances, and I could look at Ana De Armas all day, every day.

THE INVITATION spoils the hook of the film in the trailer, so there were no surprises here, but it was a decent Horror film. Probably would have been better if it were rated R. There is an unrated version, but the PG-13 version was on Netflix, and the unrated is on pay-per-view, so PG-13 won, lol.

Last night I watched a couple of documentaries, one about late WWE wrestler Bray Wyatt, which had me in tears by the end, and another about Jodorowsky's aborted attempt to make a (bonkers) film of DUNE in 1975. Truly weird stuff, which could have legitimately changed the course of cinematic history if he had succeeded in getting it made. Orson Welles as Baron Harkonnen, Dali as The Emperor, Mick Jagger as Feyd Rautha.....crazy.

I'm assuming THE INVITATION is the more recent one and not the Karyn Kusama-directed movie from 2015. If so, I definitely passed on that one. The one from 2015--completely unrelated besides the title--is one of my favorite films, though.

I have been meaning to get around to watching that Jodorowsky Dune documentary for years. Thanks for the reminder to track that down as it sounds fascinating.

[dannyboy121070]

I've been watching movies like crazy over the past few weeks...so many that I forgot some of them already. Highlights include:

THE BOYS IN THE BOAT, a fresh-from-theaters film directed by George Clooney about a Washington rowing team that made it to the Olympics in Hitler's Germany. Decent film, but if you've seen one sports biopic, you've seen this one. No surprises to be had at all.

NOSFERATU. THE VAMPYRE . Having just finished Werner Herzog's new autobiography, I felt compelled to seek out some Herzong/Kinski films. I was sure I had never seen this, but a lot of it seemed familiar...I think I saw it on Bravo back in the 90s, maybe. VERY slow and ponderous...I alternated being awestruck (Some of the lingering shots of scenery and countryside were just spectacular) and being bored by the odd pace. Kinski pales in comparison to Max Schreck, unfortunately, and this was not as good as the original. Isabelle Adjani's performance was silent-film worthy in it's dramatics. Weird film. Glad I watched it, but it bored me enough to postpone more Herzog/Kinski films for another night.

Not sure if I mentioned this in an earlier post, but I finally watched THE GRAY MAN on Netflix. Fun action film with Ryan Gosling, and Chris Evans in a rare villain role. Action-packed, good performances, and I could look at Ana De Armas all day, every day.

THE INVITATION spoils the hook of the film in the trailer, so there were no surprises here, but it was a decent Horror film. Probably would have been better if it were rated R. There is an unrated version, but the PG-13 version was on Netflix, and the unrated is on pay-per-view, so PG-13 won, lol.

Last night I watched a couple of documentaries, one about late WWE wrestler Bray Wyatt, which had me in tears by the end, and another about Jodorowsky's aborted attempt to make a (bonkers) film of DUNE in 1975. Truly weird stuff, which could have legitimately changed the course of cinematic history if he had succeeded in getting it made. Orson Welles as Baron Harkonnen, Dali as The Emperor, Mick Jagger as Feyd Rautha.....crazy.

[Sock Monkey]

Got a couple of more movies in last week before the wife returned from her trip:

I did a "scientists and the supernatural" double feature of The Stone Tape (1972) and John Carpenter's Prince of Darkness (1987), which was rather fortuitous as I subsequently learned that the former was part of the inspiration for Carpenter's latter film.

The Stone Tape has a few hurdles that current American audiences will need to clear. Namely that it is (a) from 1972, (b) rather British in its horror, and (c) it's a television movie with all the hinderances such from that time period would be saddled with, including very poor special effects for today's audiences. The story revolves around a group of scientists who, instead of working on developing a new recording medium, get sucked into investigating a one of the old building's haunted rooms. Frankly, some of the acting is rather melodramatic and a good 10-15 minutes could have been cut. However, as the film unfolded and the implications of its revelations fully sunk in, I wound up liking this one. It's a hard one to recommend, but if low budget 1970s British television movies are your jam, then it might be worth seeking out. Grade: C+

I have to admit that there is a huge gap in John Carpenter's filmography that I haven't seen, pretty much anything after The Thing and before In the Mouth of Madness, which Prince of Darkness falls into. Now, I know that I must have caught part of Prince of Darkness on television at some point because I clearly remember snippets of ending involving the glass mirror but nothing beyond this. I'd heard middling things about this film over the years and, yes, it doesn't get anywhere near the heights of Halloween or The Thing, but I was really surprised at just how effective and fun the movie was. For the uninitiated, the film is about a group of college students/scientists who are recruited by a priest to figure out what to do with a canister of liquid Satan (for lack of a better description) in the basement of an old church. As the evil substance's influence is felt, all heck begins to break loose. As I said it's a rather fun horror movie, though it does feel like maybe one more pass at the script could have brought the elements together a little bit better. However, there are some striking images in the film and some great ideas that make this more than worthwhile. Thinking back on it now, this might improve in my estimation with further subsequent viewings. This also has lit a fire under me to get around to filling in those viewing gaps for not just Carpenter, but Romero and others. Grade: B

As mentioned above, I watched these films back-to-back one night and I almost want to recommend that to everyone. I think it enriches the experience for both films.

The last film I watched was Scorsese's Casino (1995), which was perfectly fine--and might be even better if one is unfamiliar with Goodfellas--but ultimately it felt like I've seen all of these artists do this and do it better. Everyone is in top form, especially Sharon Stone in a completely unhinged performance, but instead of building to an exciting the climax, the film peters out, leading one to wonder if the three hour runtime was worth it. That all being said, even lesser Scorsese is at least worth a watch. Grade: C+

[Sock Monkey]

I'm pretty sure I saw LOGAN LUCKY and enjoyed it. Speaking of Craig, I'm going to miss him as Bond...really unfortunate that not only will he not be back, but No Time to Die was the Bond film he went out on. Putting aside what felt (SPOILER) like a poorly contrived death scene for the character, the film was -- save for a great scene involving a Triumph Scrambler 1200 -- a real disappointment in a number of ways.

I never finished watching the Craig "Bond" films. I remember enjoying both Casino Royale and Quantum of Solace, but I had one of the worst theater experiences ever when I went to see Skyfall in which a younger couple where siting a couple of seats down from us and where talking and on their phones the whole time. I told myself I'd go back and see the film again to give it another shot, but I just never did. Maybe one of these days I'll work my way through the Craig series.

[RonClinton]

I don't know why I never got around to watching it as it would be exactly in my wheelhouse--maybe I was turned off by the rather generic-looking DVD cover art--but last night I watched 2004's LAYER CAKE, starring a pre-James Bond Daniel Craig (and please disregard the cover art because Sienna Miller is in it for like five, ten minutes max). Anyways, it's a pretty fun (and very convoluted) crime thriller about a mid-level drug dealer and his crew, including a very young Tom Hardy, who get caught up in drug heist gone wrong. I really like this one and if I had seen it around release, it probably would have been in pretty heavy rotation. Grade: B+

And since I'm posting about Daniel Craig, I will do the obligatory public service announcement that if you haven't seen LOGAN LUCKY, do yourself a favor and check it out. It's a great (and funny) heist movie that bombed at the box office and is still criminally overlooked.

I'm pretty sure I saw LOGAN LUCKY and enjoyed it. Speaking of Craig, I'm going to miss him as Bond...really unfortunate that not only will he not be back, but No Time to Die was the Bond film he went out on. Putting aside what felt (SPOILER) like a poorly contrived death scene for the character, the film was -- save for a great scene involving a Triumph Scrambler 1200 -- a real disappointment in a number of ways.

[Sock Monkey]

I don't know why I never got around to watching it as it would be exactly in my wheelhouse--maybe I was turned off by the rather generic-looking DVD cover art--but last night I watched 2004's LAYER CAKE, starring a pre-James Bond Daniel Craig (and please disregard the cover art because Sienna Miller is in it for like five, ten minutes max). Anyways, it's a pretty fun (and very convoluted) crime thriller about a mid-level drug dealer and his crew, including a very young Tom Hardy, who get caught up in drug heist gone wrong. I really like this one and if I had seen it around release, it probably would have been in pretty heavy rotation. Grade: B+

And since I'm posting about Daniel Craig, I will do the obligatory public service announcement that if you haven't seen LOGAN LUCKY, do yourself a favor and check it out. It's a great (and funny) heist movie that bombed at the box office and is still criminally overlooked.

[Sock Monkey]

I'll try to keep this post shorter than the last one!

Last night I decided to revisit Christopher Nolan's DARK KNIGHT TRILOGY, though I only made it through the first two before calling a night. I was a little iffy because I remember really loving these movies when they came out and was concerned about how I would react to them as they have aged (BATMAN BEGINS came out in 2005 -- which is almost 20 YEARS AGO! -- THE DARK KNIGHT in 2008, and THE DARK KNIGHT RISES in 2012) and we have been bombarded with superhero movies ever since.

BATMAN BEGINS is a solid origin film and does a great job in the first part of the film of using various techniques to move the story back and forth in time to clear the hurdles of the death of Bruce's parents and so forth. The focus on Bruce Wayne over Batman and the mob over supervillains grounds the film even if the film still seems to be in a battle to prove that it's not Schumacher's Batman. For me, the turning point for the film where it begins to become its own thing is the scene where Bruce (Christian Bale) and Rachel (Katie Holmes, who I really enjoyed in the role) are sitting in the car and Bruce shows her the gun in his pocket and admits that he was going to kill Joe Chill. Rachel's reaction by slapping Bruce twice and telling him that his father would be ashamed of him, followed by Bruce looking so dejected could have been so cliched, but it felt surprisingly raw, letting the viewer know that this isn't just gonna be another Batman movie. I still struggle a bit with how quickly Murphy's Scarecrow is dispatched and it is hampered by being yet another Batman origin story. However, the seeds of greatness are sown here and I just don't think there is going to be better casting than Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman, and Gary Oldman in a Batman film. GRADE: B+

THE DARK KNIGHT is really where Nolan reaps what he began to sow in BEGINS. People rant and rave about this film, mostly on Ledger's Joker performance, and it's easy to maybe dismiss it as hype (or nostalgia at this point), but watching this again what stood out was just how tightly plotted this movie is. I don't think there is one wasted scene in the film and everyone just hits in the film. Christian Bale nails "playboy Bruce Wayne" and Batman. Oldman, Caine, and Freeman are not flashy yet kill every scene. Aaron Eckhart is great as Harvey Dent and I actually really liked Maggie Gyllenhaal as Rachel. And Ledger's Joker, along with the script, just nails the duality of the character being both incredibly funny, but menacing (the video tape with the fake Batman stands out, showing the violence boiling under the surface). All of this comes together in just a great film. Frankly, I don't think another superhero movie has come close to this (CAPTAIN AMERICA: WINTER SOLDIER might be the closest but is nowhere near this intricately plotted). My only minor quibble is that even at a little over two and a half hours the film could have used just a little more breathing room in some scenes, maybe setting up Gordon's family a little more. Anyways, this was so great to rewatch. Grade: A

I'll be watching THE DARK KNIGHT RISES later tonight so we'll see how that goes as it is the most divisive in the trilogy.

[Sock Monkey]

The wife is out of town for a little over a week, so I have sole control of television!

Friday night I was browsing Shudder and stumbled across THE LAST DRIVE-IN SHOW right before it started. I have a weird relationship to THE LAST DRIVE-IN SHOW as I tend to enjoy Joe Bob Briggs and have some nostalgia for the few times that I caught MONSTERVISION back in the day, but I almost never watch THE LAST DRIVE-IN SHOW. I'm almost never available to see the live show so I always have to come back to it later and I just have a hard time pulling the trigger because (a) if it's a movie a want to see but haven't, I don't really enjoy the film interruptions as it breaks the flow of the movie for me (this didn't bother me as much during MONSTERVISION because we were gonna get commercial breaks regardless), thus leading me to choose to watch the normal version of the film; and (b) if it's a movie I've already seen, then I have a hard time pulling the trigger on a three-hour "version" of it. But the wife isn't home and I was just curious as to the movie selection so I stuck around for a bit and after hearing that it was DONNIE DARKO, I committed to the watching the whole thing.

So first off, it's been an incredibly long time since I've seen DONNIE DARKO, though I've seen the film probably half a dozen times or so. I was surprised to see that it was released in 2001 because this always feels like a mid to late 90s film to me. Anyways, I still absolutely love this film, even though I'm unsure if the ending makes a lick of sense (I get the general sense of it, but I'm still left with a ton of questions). While the movie is definitely off-beat, there is something that is so watchable about it. It just sucks you in and feels so grounded and real in moments like when Donnie breaks down to his mom and asks her, "What's it like to have a whacko for a son?" To which she responds, tears in her eyes, "It's wonderful." Yet the film feels so dreamlike and surreal. The strength of the film truly is the amazing cast. Obviously, most people remember Jake Gyllenhaal, but the film also has his sister Maggie Gyllenhaal, Drew Barrymore, Patrick Swayze, Noah Wyle, Mary McDonnell, and Jena Malone (who was everywhere in independent films after this). It's even got Seth Rogan as a bully! And a bunch other people that if you don't know their names, you'll know their faces. The cast sells every minute of this film. They did show the theatrical version, so I might dig out my director's cut to give it a watch as well. I remember not being blown away by it, thinking that the theatrical was stronger, but I could be wrong on that. Anyways, DONNIE DARKO is highly recommended.

As for my experience with THE LAST DRIVE-IN, I think I was coming at it backwards by looking at it as if I wanted to see the movie itself or not, instead of viewing it as live "appointment television"-type thing, where I'm sitting down on Friday night to watch THE LAST DRIVE-IN SHOW regardless of what's playing. So I wound up enjoying it quite a bit. Maybe I'll carve more time out on Friday nights to watch it moving forward.

[Sock Monkey]

I've been on vacation trying desperately to find a new job before my psychotic co-worker takes over as big boss tomorrow morning, so I've been watching a LOT of movies at night to try to calm my skyrocketing blood pressure. Among the many:

THE MISSION on TCM on Demand, from 1986. A gorgeous film about 1700's Jesuit missionaries trying to save indigenous tribes from Portuguese slavers. Baby-faced stars include Robert De Niro, Jeremy Irons, and Liam Neeson, who was so young that I only recognized him from his height and accent. The scenery is amazing, and the scenes of Irons and De Niro climbing massive cliffs had me totally perplexed at how they did it. Highly recommended.

UNDER PARIS on Netflix is a French film about a shark on the loose in the Seine during a massive triathlon. Totally ridiculous, and suffering from the same weird plot device as the French giant spider movie I saw on Shudder a few weeks back (No spoilers!), but it was fun, and had a totally unexpected last act. As always, CGI sharks always look dodgy......give me Bruce chomping on Quint any day. My wife loved it.

FURY on Apple. This is one of those "How did I miss this for so long???" type of films. WWII tank action with Brad Pitt, with a totally bonkers finale...probably one of the best war films I've ever seen. Wife and I both loved it.

I always remember the poster/cover art for THE MISSION with DeNIro with a sword, but I've never checked it out. Great cast, though.

I saw the "trailer" (you know, those stupid short clips that Netflix runs if you stay on the tile too long, which are usually the most boring part of the movie and never gives you any good hint as to what the stinking movie or show is about), but decided to give it a pass. I have a hard time "blind watching" anything on Netflix. There's so much junk on there that I feel I could waste hours just watching the first five minutes of bad movies. It's too bad because I enjoy animal attack movies when done right. I actually had a blast with Alexandre Aja's CRAWL.

Your praise of FURY has got me thinking I need to give it another shot. I watched the first fifteen minutes or so of the film during a flight (granted not the best way to watch a movie) and just couldn't get engaged. My friend praised it as well, but his taste diverges greatly from mine at times so I took it with a grain of salt. Also, come to find out my wife really likes war movies so this might be up her alley.

[dannyboy121070]

I've been on vacation trying desperately to find a new job before my psychotic co-worker takes over as big boss tomorrow morning, so I've been watching a LOT of movies at night to try to calm my skyrocketing blood pressure. Among the many:

THE MISSION on TCM on Demand, from 1986. A gorgeous film about 1700's Jesuit missionaries trying to save indigenous tribes from Portuguese slavers. Baby-faced stars include Robert De Niro, Jeremy Irons, and Liam Neeson, who was so young that I only recognized him from his height and accent. The scenery is amazing, and the scenes of Irons and De Niro climbing massive cliffs had me totally perplexed at how they did it. Highly recommended.

UNDER PARIS on Netflix is a French film about a shark on the loose in the Seine during a massive triathlon. Totally ridiculous, and suffering from the same weird plot device as the French giant spider movie I saw on Shudder a few weeks back (No spoilers!), but it was fun, and had a totally unexpected last act. As always, CGI sharks always look dodgy......give me Bruce chomping on Quint any day. My wife loved it.

FURY on Apple. This is one of those "How did I miss this for so long???" type of films. WWII tank action with Brad Pitt, with a totally bonkers finale...probably one of the best war films I've ever seen. Wife and I both loved it.

[dannyboy121070]

I saw GODZILLA MINUS ONE pop up and I'm pretty excited to check it out. I really, really want to like a Godzilla movie, but, to be honest, I've never seen a single one that I've enjoyed. Now, I also have never seen the original nor the highly recommended SHIN GODZILLA, mostly catching some of the other sequels (SMOG MONSTER, MECHAGODZILLA) and I honestly don't know if I ever made it through any of them. I did see the 2014 American remake, but wasn't blown a way. (It might be sacrilegious to say, but I think that CLOVERFIELD is the best that America has done with a kaiju-type film.) I'm hoping that this one will break my Godzilla trend. I plan on watching it with the wife, so it might be a week or two before I get to check it out. Fingers crossed because I really want to like it.

As far as Antoine Fuqua's filmography, I find it hard to disagree. I don't think that he necessarily makes bad films, just nothing that really stands out, fading from memory rapidly after watching them. I remember watching TEARS OF THE SUN a couple of times, but always though at the time that it was lesser Bruce Willis. SOUTHPAW I also really wanted to enjoy due to the talent involved but it just didn't work for me. Same could be said for THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN remake, which was fine, but lacked any kind of heart. Most of his other film just never piqued my interest. TRAINING DAY, though, is still a really good watch.

For sure, Fuqua makes watchable films, just nothing that has ever come close to his one GREAT movie.

[Sock Monkey]

We watched GODZILLA MINUS ONE the other night, and we both loved it. My wife is NOT a monster-movie fan, but she has been raving about it to everyone we've seen over the past few days. The effects were amazing, especially the scenes of Godzilla pursuing the small boats...nerve-wracking stuff. Definitely the best Godzilla film I've ever seen.

Lat night I had a hankering to finally catch a film I've wanted to see since I was a kid: BINGO LONG'S TRAVELING ALL-STARS AND MOTOR KINGS. A semi-whimsical movie about negro-league ballplayers who leave their oppressive team-owners and start a barnstorming team of their own, the first half was charming and fun, and the second half got a little more serious, which moved it from "I loved it!!!" territory to just "Really good". Billy Dee Williams and James Earl Jones were outstanding.

I also finished up Denzel's EQUALIZER trilogy, and the law of diminishing returns was in full effect in these three films, with the third being a pointless killfest from start to finish. I was nice seeing Denzel reunited with Dakota Fanning, his MAN ON FIRE costar, but other than that and some truly eye-popping kills, there was nothing much to recommend. I find Director Antoine Fuqua to be a filmmaker who has coasted by on having made one truly great film (TRAINING DAY), and it's been all mediocrity ever since.

I saw GODZILLA MINUS ONE pop up and I'm pretty excited to check it out. I really, really want to like a Godzilla movie, but, to be honest, I've never seen a single one that I've enjoyed. Now, I also have never seen the original nor the highly recommended SHIN GODZILLA, mostly catching some of the other sequels (SMOG MONSTER, MECHAGODZILLA) and I honestly don't know if I ever made it through any of them. I did see the 2014 American remake, but wasn't blown a way. (It might be sacrilegious to say, but I think that CLOVERFIELD is the best that America has done with a kaiju-type film.) I'm hoping that this one will break my Godzilla trend. I plan on watching it with the wife, so it might be a week or two before I get to check it out. Fingers crossed because I really want to like it.

As far as Antoine Fuqua's filmography, I find it hard to disagree. I don't think that he necessarily makes bad films, just nothing that really stands out, fading from memory rapidly after watching them. I remember watching TEARS OF THE SUN a couple of times, but always though at the time that it was lesser Bruce Willis. SOUTHPAW I also really wanted to enjoy due to the talent involved but it just didn't work for me. Same could be said for THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN remake, which was fine, but lacked any kind of heart. Most of his other film just never piqued my interest. TRAINING DAY, though, is still a really good watch.

[dannyboy121070]

We watched GODZILLA MINUS ONE the other night, and we both loved it. My wife is NOT a monster-movie fan, but she has been raving about it to everyone we've seen over the past few days. The effects were amazing, especially the scenes of Godzilla pursuing the small boats...nerve-wracking stuff. Definitely the best Godzilla film I've ever seen.

Lat night I had a hankering to finally catch a film I've wanted to see since I was a kid: BINGO LONG'S TRAVELING ALL-STARS AND MOTOR KINGS. A semi-whimsical movie about negro-league ballplayers who leave their oppressive team-owners and start a barnstorming team of their own, the first half was charming and fun, and the second half got a little more serious, which moved it from "I loved it!!!" territory to just "Really good". Billy Dee Williams and James Earl Jones were outstanding.

I also finished up Denzel's EQUALIZER trilogy, and the law of diminishing returns was in full effect in these three films, with the third being a pointless killfest from start to finish. I was nice seeing Denzel reunited with Dakota Fanning, his MAN ON FIRE costar, but other than that and some truly eye-popping kills, there was nothing much to recommend. I find Director Antoine Fuqua to be a filmmaker who has coasted by on having made one truly great film (TRAINING DAY), and it's been all mediocrity ever since.

[sholloman81]

I've just started working through the Vinnegar Syndrome Lost Picture Show boxed set. All the films in this set were considered lost and were located & restored by Vinegar Syndrome. Most of the films are low-budget genre pics from the early 60's-70's. Watched the first film last night, Carlos Tobalina's "What's Love?" and was pleasantly surprised. Very sleazy low-budget film about the devil coming to earth and seducing three sets of people: a cop, a priest, and a troubled married couple. Has all sorts of neat 70's type freakouts, a fun soundtrack, and much more nudity than I had expected, including the infamous Ginger Lynn. Overall, while not a great film by any standards, I am glad to have seen this and think it was a fine start to this box set.

Just watched two more movies from this set: Larry Crane's "Beware the Black Widow" and Joe Sarno's "Deep Inside". Both were enjoyable. Sarno's film reminded me a little of "Cruel Intentions" however with lots of nudity and was basically about a group of friends' Summer beach retreat and how one of the girls within the group subverts the relationships of the other girls within the group and eventually gets her just desserts. Crane's film was basically a proto-giallo about a group of rapists being picked-off one by one. It's pretty easy to guess the killer, but beyond that, the film's loads of fun, also has tons of nudity, violence, and a very fun/unexpected soundtrack. Also fun seeing 60's New York city on screen. These little regional affairs always make me nostalgic for old architecture and before major cities were Disneyfied into sameness. Overall, while both films are no budget regional genre pics, I found both totally watchable and am happy to have see them. So far, this boxed set is off to a very good start!

[Sock Monkey]

For some reason I typically like these cheesy movies. There is something about them I find charming in a weird and twisted way.



Â

You know, I wish that I had same appreciation for them--it would definitely open up my viewing options--and I can see your point of view. I'm by no means snobby about film as I can forgive some shortcomings, especially in low budget affairs, but the cheesy films just don't scratch the itch for me. However, I'm glad that they have an audience as I'm not one to feel that something should be dismissed or ignored just because I don't enjoy it.