Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Stephen King the Doubleday Years

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • bookworm 1
    replied
    Originally posted by Vamperotika View Post
    Hiya Brian, when's "The Stand" coming?
    It’s already here. We’ve been living it the last 14 months.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vamperotika
    replied
    Hiya Brian, when's "The Stand" coming?

    Leave a comment:


  • Dave1442397
    replied
    That's quite a stack! I can't wait to see the final version.

    Leave a comment:


  • mulleins
    replied
    Wow....looks like 1500 pages (3 reams).

    Mulleins

    Leave a comment:


  • bsaenz24
    replied
    Looks like a self-defense weapon!

    Leave a comment:


  • Brian James Freeman
    replied
    If you've ever wondered what THE STAND printed out single-sided on copy paper might look like, here you go...

    Leave a comment:


  • slayn666
    replied
    Originally posted by swintek View Post

    Hey, despite CD's problems thus far with the DD Years- and, sincerely hoping that those problems are in the past- I am ALL for the Viking Years. The books are great, and I'm glad to have them. Just would like one every six months. Surely we can manage that now that the printer is sorted, no?
    Their shortest gap between Doubleday titles was twelve or so months between 'Salem's Lot and The Shining, which predated both their initial printer issues and the supply chain issues caused by the pandemic. King titles are also incredibly large undertakings for CD and their subs, even in the absolute best circumstances. For them to do two King books a year would likely mean they'd have to give up publishing anything else until a hypothetical Viking Years set was completed.

    I'd absolutely sign up for a Viking Years set, but I would also expect the timeline involved to be measured in decades rather than years.

    Leave a comment:


  • swintek
    replied
    Originally posted by slayn666 View Post

    They've barely managed three in a decade, let's not get ahead of ourselves here
    Hey, despite CD's problems thus far with the DD Years- and, sincerely hoping that those problems are in the past- I am ALL for the Viking Years. The books are great, and I'm glad to have them. Just would like one every six months. Surely we can manage that now that the printer is sorted, no?

    Leave a comment:


  • slayn666
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin View Post
    So now that CD is closing in on the 2/3 point of The Doubleday Years set this would be a good time to announce The Viking Years. Of course this a much larger effort so you should probably plan for 3 releases a year.
    They've barely managed three in a decade, let's not get ahead of ourselves here

    Leave a comment:


  • bsaenz24
    replied
    Originally posted by Brian James Freeman View Post

    Yep, I think it was 100% the need to cut so many pages simply because of pricing/printing concerns. Bev Vincent has written a great (unannounced) essay all about this, which will appear at the end of our special edition of THE STAND.

    Brian
    Gotta LOVE bonus materials!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Brian861
    replied
    Originally posted by taost33 View Post
    The only thing I found a little jarring in the original Stand was how Trashcan Man suddenly ended up in Las Vegas after not being heard from in a while. I thought the expanded text helped to shed some light on his trip across country and on his importance.
    This is probably why I prefer the uncut.

    Leave a comment:


  • Brian James Freeman
    replied
    Originally posted by Martin View Post
    I have heard several authors, Mr. King included, praise their editors. I really believe, with no basis in fact, that being edited because the printer can't handle the length is an issue.
    Yep, I think it was 100% the need to cut so many pages simply because of pricing/printing concerns. Bev Vincent has written a great (unannounced) essay all about this, which will appear at the end of our special edition of THE STAND.

    Brian

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    Originally posted by taost33 View Post
    The only thing I found a little jarring in the original Stand was how Trashcan Man suddenly ended up in Las Vegas after not being heard from in a while. I thought the expanded text helped to shed some light on his trip across country and on his importance.
    I agree that not all in the uncut version is needed to advance the story. I do feel that the flow of the uncut story is better which is why I prefer it.,

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    Originally posted by mhatchett View Post
    I guess artistically, no writer wants to be edited at all lol!
    I have heard several authors, Mr. King included, praise their editors. I really believe, with no basis in fact, that being edited because the printer can't handle the length is an issue.

    Leave a comment:


  • taost33
    replied
    The only thing I found a little jarring in the original Stand was how Trashcan Man suddenly ended up in Las Vegas after not being heard from in a while. I thought the expanded text helped to shed some light on his trip across country and on his importance.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X