Rate the Last Movie You Saw

[brlesh]

Saw 28 Years Later the other night, and understand why the movie is so divisive.

If you are looking for a non-stop zombie action movie, 28 Years Later isn’t it. The scenes with the zombies / infected are well used in the storyline when they are on screen, but 28 Years Later is as much, if not more, a coming of age story about a 12 year old boy growing up under difficult family circumstances 28 years after the fall of society as we know it.

The movie is well acted, especially the young actor who plays Spike (the boy).

The infected scenes are well handled, and there was an interesting sub-plot about the infected mutating and evolving.

My biggest complaint with the film is the ending, which was so jarring and out of context with the rest of the movie.

The ending did answer a lingering question from the beginning of the movie, but that question could have been answered in a less jarring manner.

Overall I enjoyed 28 Years Later, and most fans of the previous two movies will probably find enough to liked in this third installment, the last three minutes not withstanding.

B

[Ben Staad]

John and The Hole. I guess this is an art house style drama. Not much drama, hard to watch, and besides feeling a profound sadness for a disabled child and broken home there isn't much there.

1.5 out of 5.

[Ben Staad]

Synchronic. A sci-fi, time traveling film, set in Louisiana. I liked pretty much everything about this one. There are some big gaps in the story but they did a great job of pushing the narrative forward and not providing much time to think about things. Straight forward and very watchable. Some nice dialogue, solid acting, and the visuals and music weren't bad either.

3.5 out of 5.

[Sock Monkey]

Synchronic. A sci-fi, time traveling film, set in Louisiana. I liked pretty much everything about this one. There are some big gaps in the story but they did a great job of pushing the narrative forward and not providing much time to think about things. Straight forward and very watchable. Some nice dialogue, solid acting, and the visuals and music weren't bad either.

3.5 out of 5.

I caught Synchronic at Fantastic Fest a few years back and while I enjoyed it--as I do with all of Benson and Moorhead's stuff--I found the beginning of the movie with this almost post-apocalyptic Louisiana so compelling that I was a little bummed with where the film eventually went. I need to give it another watch to see if my thoughts change now that I know where the film lands.

[Sock Monkey]

Saw 28 Years Later the other night, and understand why the movie is so divisive.

If you are looking for a non-stop zombie action movie, 28 Years Later isn’t it. The scenes with the zombies / infected are well used in the storyline when they are on screen, but 28 Years Later is as much, if not more, a coming of age story about a 12 year old boy growing up under difficult family circumstances 28 years after the fall of society as we know it.

The movie is well acted, especially the young actor who plays Spike (the boy).

The infected scenes are well handled, and there was an interesting sub-plot about the infected mutating and evolving.

My biggest complaint with the film is the ending, which was so jarring and out of context with the rest of the movie.

The ending did answer a lingering question from the beginning of the movie, but that question could have been answered in a less jarring manner.

Overall I enjoyed 28 Years Later, and most fans of the previous two movies will probably find enough to liked in this third installment, the last three minutes not withstanding.

B

So I caught this a couple weeks back at the local drive-in (which I actually really enjoy going to; the video isn't as crisp as an actual theatre and the sound obviously suffers as well, but there's something so simple and unpretentious about it that I find appealing) on a double feature with Jurassic Park: Rebirth, which I'll get to in a bit. I absolutely agree with all the points you make in your post: the cast is great, including the kid playing Spike; the infected scenes are actually quite intense, and it builds on the first films without tarnishing it (though an argument could be made that 28 Weeks Later already did that). I also agree that the ending comes off as not just jarring, but almost ridiculous. After we get this very ponderous, melancholic time spent in the Bone Temple, the film ends on some silliness. There also was some great use of editing in the film with intercutting both sound and video that I really liked. Overall, I liked the film and was glad to see Danny Boyle back in top form. Grade: B

Jurassic Park: Rebirth, on the other hand, is probably the most impressively stupid movie I've watched in a long time. Now, to be fair, I didn't watch the previous two films in the franchise; I tapped out when Chris Pratt made friends with the raptors. To be fair, Gareth Edwards is a solid director and any of the scenes involving dinosaur action is executed very well. It's just that everything that is not an action set piece is just plain bad. Both Scarlett Johannson and Mahershala Ali are completely wasted in this film, but at least Ali seems to know what film he's in. Johannson, on the other hand, feels so tonally out of place and could have easily just been removed from the plot for how little she actually comes into play versus any of the other random characters. Then there's the family that gets rescued by the Johannson and crew, but consist of the single most unlikeable character ever that I hated more than the actual "human bad guy" of the film. On top of the this, the jokes don't land and it hits the beats of so many of its predecessors that I can't really recommend this beyond maybe a lazy Sunday between naps. Grade: D-

[dannyboy121070]

So I caught this a couple weeks back at the local drive-in (which I actually really enjoy going to; the video isn't as crisp as an actual theatre and the sound obviously suffers as well, but there's something so simple and unpretentious about it that I find appealing) on a double feature with Jurassic Park: Rebirth, which I'll get to in a bit. I absolutely agree with all the points you make in your post: the cast is great, including the kid playing Spike; the infected scenes are actually quite intense, and it builds on the first films without tarnishing it (though an argument could be made that 28 Weeks Later already did that). I also agree that the ending comes off as not just jarring, but almost ridiculous. After we get this very ponderous, melancholic time spent in the Bone Temple, the film ends on some silliness. There also was some great use of editing in the film with intercutting both sound and video that I really liked. Overall, I liked the film and was glad to see Danny Boyle back in top form. Grade: B

Jurassic Park: Rebirth, on the other hand, is probably the most impressively stupid movie I've watched in a long time. Now, to be fair, I didn't watch the previous two films in the franchise; I tapped out when Chris Pratt made friends with the raptors. To be fair, Gareth Edwards is a solid director and any of the scenes involving dinosaur action is executed very well. It's just that everything that is not an action set piece is just plain bad. Both Scarlett Johannson and Mahershala Ali are completely wasted in this film, but at least Ali seems to know what film he's in. Johannson, on the other hand, feels so tonally out of place and could have easily just been removed from the plot for how little she actually comes into play versus any of the other random characters. Then there's the family that gets rescued by the Johannson and crew, but consist of the single most unlikeable character ever that I hated more than the actual "human bad guy" of the film. On top of the this, the jokes don't land and it hits the beats of so many of its predecessors that I can't really recommend this beyond maybe a lazy Sunday between naps. Grade: D-

As far as the goofy last few minutes of 28 YEARS LATER, it seems to have hit completely different for UK audiences, so I'd advise anyone interested to google JImmy Saville, which will explain a lot.

As far as JP, all I can think about these movies is "When the eff are they going to get away from these islands? FALLEN KINGDOM set up a world with dinosaurs running loose, and then the next movie was like "Nah, let's go back to an island!".....and here we go again.

[Sock Monkey]

As far as the goofy last few minutes of 28 YEARS LATER, it seems to have hit completely different for UK audiences, so I'd advise anyone interested to google JImmy Saville, which will explain a lot.

As far as JP, all I can think about these movies is "When the eff are they going to get away from these islands? FALLEN KINGDOM set up a world with dinosaurs running loose, and then the next movie was like "Nah, let's go back to an island!".....and here we go again.

Oh, thanks for the heads up regarding 28 Years Later. I only have a passing knowledge about Jimmy Saville, but the movie makes a lot more sense within that context. Still, all the leaping parkour stuff was little strange.

And I agree with these Jurassic Park films. They really just don't know what to do with them it seems like.

[dannyboy121070]

We saw Superman and Fantastic Four on their respective opening weekends. Superman was a lot of fun. I liked how they just jumped into a fully-formed world with no time or interest in origin stories, you just hit the ground running and catch up as you go. Fun film, and James Gunn really seems to get the character. My son and I loved it, my wife hated it.

Fantastic Four: First Steps looked amazing in Imax 3-D, and the peppy 60s-throwback storytelling really worked with these characters. It was amazing to see a comic-accurate Galactus in a movie...I never thought I would live to see the day. My son and I both loved it, and my wife said she "had a great time".