Rate the Last Movie You Saw

[Ben Staad]

That is awesome. Glad to hear that the magic of Cinema is still alive.

There is something special about watching a good story at the theater that I don't think can ever be replicated at home.

Finally got a chance to check out the local revival house theater in town (Come on, I mean, it's only been three years...) and wound up having a great time. They were showing the new 4K restoration of Seven. I was only 16 or 17 when the film came out and wound up watching it alone on some satellite pay-per-view channel, and I was not prepared for the oppressive bleakness of the film. Almost 30 years later (dear god...), I couldn't miss out on seeing the film on the big screen. I took my nephew, who I have taken under my wing in order to improve his cinematic education, and while I had shown him the film about a year ago, he enjoyed it maybe more this time.

First, the new restoration was very nice and a much-needed improvement over my incredibly old DVD. I was worried that the film would look too nice as some of the film's atmospheric texture comes from how dark it is, but that worry was for naught. It's still as dark as ever, but just more crisp in appearance. The audio track was much improved with a greater clarity of voices. So I will definitely be picking up the disc one of these days.

Second, I was worried the film wouldn't hold up for the audience, which was a mix of middle-aged folks, college students, and one awesome elderly couple that had to be in their 70s. Now, the audience is definitely different for a revival house than a regular cinema, with the assumption that since there are a lot easier and cheaper ways to watch the film, the people there are actually there on purpose and not to kill time. Even with that in mind, once the film locked in, you could hear a pin drop in the theatre. There were laughs ("the soothing, relaxing, vibrating home") and cries of shock (the "sloth" victim), but it was all from an audience just held in the palm of a film. Watching people who had no idea what they were getting into walk out like they had just been kicked in the stomach was a lot of fun. It sounds weird, but I just couldn't stop smiling. It was great to see the film still had its power. The elderly couple, though, walked out arm-in-arm with smiles on their faces like they had just watched When Harry Met Sally or something. Man, I want that to be me and my wife when we're that age.

[Sock Monkey]

Finally got a chance to check out the local revival house theater in town (Come on, I mean, it's only been three years...) and wound up having a great time. They were showing the new 4K restoration of Seven. I was only 16 or 17 when the film came out and wound up watching it alone on some satellite pay-per-view channel, and I was not prepared for the oppressive bleakness of the film. Almost 30 years later (dear god...), I couldn't miss out on seeing the film on the big screen. I took my nephew, who I have taken under my wing in order to improve his cinematic education, and while I had shown him the film about a year ago, he enjoyed it maybe more this time.

First, the new restoration was very nice and a much-needed improvement over my incredibly old DVD. I was worried that the film would look too nice as some of the film's atmospheric texture comes from how dark it is, but that worry was for naught. It's still as dark as ever, but just more crisp in appearance. The audio track was much improved with a greater clarity of voices. So I will definitely be picking up the disc one of these days.

Second, I was worried the film wouldn't hold up for the audience, which was a mix of middle-aged folks, college students, and one awesome elderly couple that had to be in their 70s. Now, the audience is definitely different for a revival house than a regular cinema, with the assumption that since there are a lot easier and cheaper ways to watch the film, the people there are actually there on purpose and not to kill time. Even with that in mind, once the film locked in, you could hear a pin drop in the theatre. There were laughs ("the soothing, relaxing, vibrating home") and cries of shock (the "sloth" victim), but it was all from an audience just held in the palm of a film. Watching people who had no idea what they were getting into walk out like they had just been kicked in the stomach was a lot of fun. It sounds weird, but I just couldn't stop smiling. It was great to see the film still had its power. The elderly couple, though, walked out arm-in-arm with smiles on their faces like they had just watched When Harry Met Sally or something. Man, I want that to be me and my wife when we're that age.

[brlesh]

Just saw Wolf Man, and first impressions were I liked it quite a bit, more than I was expecting based on the reviews I read.

The acting was decent, the effects (all practical, I believe, no CGI) were good, and at a 90 minute run time, the story moved along at a good pace. The script was a little cringy at times, but hey, it’s a horror movie.

I give the filmmakers props, they tried to do something different with the traditional werewolf story.

Overall, I definitely thought Wolf Man was worth a view.

B

[dannyboy121070]

This is so true. The amount of male full frontal I've seen in films over the last three to five years seems to have grown exponentially (no pun intended).

Pun or not, thanks for the laugh!

[Sock Monkey]

Wang is the new boobs. Everything has wang in it these days.

This is so true. The amount of male full frontal I've seen in films over the last three to five years seems to have grown exponentially (no pun intended).

[dannyboy121070]

What!? I hadn't heard of full frontal in this movie. Seems like no one needed vampire wang.

Wang is the new boobs. Everything has wang in it these days. We were watching A DIFFERENT MAN on Max last week, and all of a sudden the camera pulled back to include a lingering shot of Sebastian Stan's little Winter Soldier. At least the Nosferatu wang was a prosthetic.

[Ben Staad]

What!? I hadn't heard of full frontal in this movie. Seems like no one needed vampire wang.

Probably more vampire penis!

[Ben Staad]

The Hunger Games: The Ballad of Songbirds & Snakes.

I greatly disliked this movie. 1 out of 5.

The original series of movies I enjoyed enough but this prequel was disjointed, confusing, and made very little sense. No chemistry between anyone, no depth to the characters, and they seemingly crammed another movie into the last hour of this thing. If this would have ended at the end of act 2 I would have given this a 2.5 out of 5 and thought it was a decent stopping point.

I was stunned how poorly this movie was put together.

[Sock Monkey]

I hope not, lol. I read that there is already an extended cut available on-demand, and it was only 4 minutes longer. Probably more vampire penis!

LOL!

[dannyboy121070]

Talking about Nosferatu, I heard there's a three hour cut out there. Wonder if that's ever going to see the light of day.

I hope not, lol. I read that there is already an extended cut available on-demand, and it was only 4 minutes longer. Probably more vampire penis!

[Sock Monkey]

Talking about Nosferatu, I heard there's a three hour cut out there. Wonder if that's ever going to see the light of day.

[dannyboy121070]

dannyboy121070 brlesh

Thanks for the replies. It's not likely I will get to see this in the theater (Bummer) but will check this out once it's on something I already pay for.

It'll probably hit Peacock by March. They already have a making-of doc on there.

[Ben Staad]

dannyboy121070 brlesh

Thanks for the replies. It's not likely I will get to see this in the theater (Bummer) but will check this out once it's on something I already pay for.

[brlesh]

Listed runtime is a little over 2 hours. Did the movie feel long at all?

Not at all.

With the 20 - 30 minute pre-movie trailers & commercials, I tend to start getting antsy around the 2 hour mark, or earlier if I’m bored with the movie.

I actually never once thought about the time during Nosferatu.

B

[dannyboy121070]

Listed runtime is a little over 2 hours. Did the movie feel long at all?

I saw it Christmas week, and I remember it as being closer to two and a half hours. Great-looking film, but I think I finally hit Dracula fatigue, or at least fatigue of the traditional Dracula retelling. I was bored a lot of the time, and while Skarsgard delivers a great, totally unrecognizable performance, the look of Count Orlock, which was kept top-secret, proved to be a huge letdown, and reminded me a lot of a major vampire character from early on in Mike Mignola's HELLBOY series. I was hoping for a more faithful update of the silent-film version. My filmmaking-school son loved it, but...I guess I've seen too much, am too jaded? Been there and done that. Everyone else seems to love it, though. I did think it was worth seeing for the performances. Willem Dafoe was great, as always.