Bond is a hard breakdown for me. I like every Bond in a different way. Brosnan is one that is particular hard to place, as I really think only one of his Bond movies was good, but it was so good that it's probably one of my favorite Bond movies.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rate the Last Movie You Saw
Collapse
X
-
CD Email: [email protected]
Non-Work related social media and what not:
Instagram
Buy my stuff! - https://www.etsy.com/shop/HockersWoodWorks
-
Originally posted by srboone View PostTimothy Dalton was Bond at his peak for me. Brosnan was a thruway Bond. Craig's interpretation is great.
Originally posted by Dan Hocker View PostBond is a hard breakdown for me. I like every Bond in a different way. Brosnan is one that is particular hard to place, as I really think only one of his Bond movies was good, but it was so good that it's probably one of my favorite Bond movies.“Reality is a nice place to visit, but you wouldn’t want to live there.”
-John Barth
https://bugensbooks.com/
Comment
-
Originally posted by bugen View PostI'm with you, Dan, they can be tough to like. I'm sure we're both thinking of GoldenEye as his best, and I think it's one of the best Bond movies ever made. I also found a lot to like in Die Another Day, partially because it was the first time we'd seen a broken Bond after being disavowed, enduring months of torture, then trying to regain his spirit and prowess.CD Email: [email protected]
Non-Work related social media and what not:
Instagram
Buy my stuff! - https://www.etsy.com/shop/HockersWoodWorks
Comment
-
Well, it's tough to say which are actually the best Bond movies, but now having seen the 4 Daniel Craig films I've got to say his run is my favorite from any of the actors (I always forget Lazenby, and I've never seen his film).
At this point I've still gotta stand by Brosnan's portrayal as the final version of Bond, kind of like Eastwood's portrayal in The Unforgiven was the final version of The Man with No Name. Unofficial, but a nice narrative and evolution of the character. Like Brian said, Daniel Craig plays the 'man's man,' and I really like how his set builds on its own storyline like one extended saga. It's a damned fine collection of films.
Casino Royal - 5 stars
Quantum of Solace - 3+ stars
Skyfall - 4 stars
Spectre - 5- (4+) stars“Reality is a nice place to visit, but you wouldn’t want to live there.”
-John Barth
https://bugensbooks.com/
Comment
-
Originally posted by bugen View PostWell, it's tough to say which are actually the best Bond movies, but now having seen the 4 Daniel Craig films I've got to say his run is my favorite from any of the actors (I always forget Lazenby, and I've never seen his film).
At this point I've still gotta stand by Brosnan's portrayal as the final version of Bond, kind of like Eastwood's portrayal in The Unforgiven was the final version of The Man with No Name. Unofficial, but a nice narrative and evolution of the character. Like Brian said, Daniel Craig plays the 'man's man,' and I really like how his set builds on its own storyline like one extended saga. It's a damned fine collection of films.
Casino Royal - 5 stars
Quantum of Solace - 3+ stars
Skyfall - 4 stars
Spectre - 5- (4+) starsCD Email: [email protected]
Non-Work related social media and what not:
Instagram
Buy my stuff! - https://www.etsy.com/shop/HockersWoodWorks
Comment
-
I didn't actually complete the 4-film marathon in one shot, and Skyfall ended around 4 am when I decided to hold off on Spectre until the next day--tiredness could have been a factor in enjoyment. But I did end up liking Spectre a bit more, and part of it was because I liked how Daniel Craig played it. I saw the rumor he was offered $150 million for two more, and also that he was under a loose contract for a total of 5. But he'd also said in the media he'd hate to do another Bond film.
These are great movies and I want to bring up the ending. Please no one read this unless you've seen them:
Spoiler!I actually feel like the ending of Spectre is a great ending for Daniel Craig as James Bond. You're right, Dan, he seemed tired and even old in the last film, like he didn't want to be there. For me that seemed to work for the character, who wanted out. It's sort of meta. Even though Blofeld lives to come up in the other Bond films, if you interpret Bond leaving the agency at the end of Spectre to run away with Dr. Swann as permanent, it all makes for kind of a perfect story arc.
Anyway, the way it all wrapped up helped boost the rating for me. Even though the Daniel Craig films were my favorites of the Bond movies, I hope they go with a new Bond and Craig gets these four as a complete, cool story.“Reality is a nice place to visit, but you wouldn’t want to live there.”
-John Barth
https://bugensbooks.com/
Comment
-
Originally posted by bugen View PostI didn't actually complete the 4-film marathon in one shot, and Skyfall ended around 4 am when I decided to hold off on Spectre until the next day--tiredness could have been a factor in enjoyment. But I did end up liking Spectre a bit more, and part of it was because I liked how Daniel Craig played it. I saw the rumor he was offered $150 million for two more, and also that he was under a loose contract for a total of 5. But he'd also said in the media he'd hate to do another Bond film.
These are great movies and I want to bring up the ending. Please no one read this unless you've seen them:
Spoiler!I actually feel like the ending of Spectre is a great ending for Daniel Craig as James Bond. You're right, Dan, he seemed tired and even old in the last film, like he didn't want to be there. For me that seemed to work for the character, who wanted out. It's sort of meta. Even though Blofeld lives to come up in the other Bond films, if you interpret Bond leaving the agency at the end of Spectre to run away with Dr. Swann as permanent, it all makes for kind of a perfect story arc.
Anyway, the way it all wrapped up helped boost the rating for me. Even though the Daniel Craig films were my favorites of the Bond movies, I hope they go with a new Bond and Craig gets these four as a complete, cool story.CD Email: [email protected]
Non-Work related social media and what not:
Instagram
Buy my stuff! - https://www.etsy.com/shop/HockersWoodWorks
Comment
-
Anyone Remember 'Brotherhood of the Wolf" 2001? Brotherhood of the Wolf (French: Le Pacte des loups) is a 2001 French historical horror-action film[3][4] directed by Christophe Gans, written by Gans and Stéphane Cabel, starring Samuel Le Bihan, Mark Dacascos, Émilie Dequenne, Monica Bellucci, and Vincent Cassel.
The film is loosely based on a real-life series of killings that took place in France in the 18th century and the famous legend of the Beast of Gévaudan; parts of the film were shot at Château de Roquetaillade. The film has several extended swashbuckling fight scenes, with martial arts performances by the cast mixed in, making it unusual for a historical drama.
Great to re-watch it as a Halloween Treat!
Comment
-
Originally posted by mhatchett View PostAnyone Remember 'Brotherhood of the Wolf" 2001? Brotherhood of the Wolf (French: Le Pacte des loups)
However I don't remember the last time I took this for a spin, but have let a number of people borrow it and they've all enjoyed it.
Might have to take this out when I have a free weekend (can't see my GF enjoying this one.)
Comment
-
I loved The Brotherhood of the Wolf! That's a good idea to bust this one out for Halloween.“Reality is a nice place to visit, but you wouldn’t want to live there.”
-John Barth
https://bugensbooks.com/
Comment
-
The Legend of Hell House: I'm a huge Richard Matheson fan and his novel Hell House is a classic, but for some reason I never got around to watching the 1973 movie based on the book with a screenplay by Matheson himself. Overall, it's a faithful if idiosyncratically directed--the camera angles and blocking are all over the place in this movie-- adaptation of the novel. Roddy McDowell as Fisher steals the show, but the cast is uniformly good even if the acting is a little uneven at times.
The movie is good, but not great, and what stifles it is the pacing. Like Matheson's prose, scenes are tight and to the point, but unlike the writer's novel there is little connective tissue to bind the movie together, creating at times a sense of the movie being more a series of scenes rather than a naturally flowing narrative. An additional fifteen minutes to flesh out the characters and build their arcs would have made the movie even more effective.
What also doesn't help was the choice to give date and time stamps on the screen breaking the tension. As soon as I started to get into the groove, the movie would cut to another master shot of the Belasco House and title letting us know that it was December 23 at 9:40am. This would work if the movie utilized it to control the ebb and flow of tension, using it to create a break in the tension only to build it once again. Unfortunately, if this was the intention it doesn't work due to the fact that the movie never truly frightens.
I watched the Scream Factory Blu-ray release and, as always, their work to restore these rather forgotten horror movies is fantastic. There was a scene that was rather grainy, but beyond that the picture was beautiful. If you are going to watch this movie, I'd recommend seeing it in this fashion.
As a whole, being a horror movie and Richard Matheson fan, I enjoyed it for what it was: a surprisingly dark haunted house tale that while not as memorable as other more notable films in the subgenre, was worth the 85 minute runtime. Here's to Mike Flanagan or James Wan doing a remake.
Grade: C
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sock Monkey View PostThis is Darren Lynn Bousman's new movie, right? I heard about this and it sounds pretty interesting.
Unlike..... I Am The Pretty Thing That Lives In The House.... Netflix original. Sounded good by the description but...... I don't understand what the point of it was!
Comment
Comment