Originally posted by Dan Hocker
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Random thoughts...
Collapse
X
-
Nothing to see here!Ok, I really can't come up with anymore of these stupid things...
- May 2011
- 8799
Originally posted by sholloman81 View PostAsked a coworker what books they have recently read and was told about books they listened to in the car. I may have come off as slightly snobbish when I responded that I don't consider listening to audiobooks as reading. To me, they are two different things. I personally never listen to audiobooks. I don't find the same enjoyment level as when physically reading a book and don't want the story spoiled by potentially not liking the narrator. If I am driving or doing some other physical activity that prevents reading, I would much prefer to just listen to music and find time later on to actually sit down and read. Anyone feel the same way or have I pushed into snobsville?
Comment
-
Sorry Brian861. Wasn't my intent to offend at all and didn't really consider it from a disability perspective such as blindness. I'm also sure that there a tons of people who love audiobooks and listen to them exclusively rather than reading a physical copy. I guess that I was just trying to make the point that I feel physically reading a book and listening to an audiobook are two different experiences and that I don't really care for audiobooks in general. I'm sure that I could've worded that opinion better. Thanks for the differing perspective and giving me more to think about when it comes to this topic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sholloman81 View PostI guess that I was just trying to make the point that I feel physically reading a book and listening to an audiobook are two different experiences and that I don't really care for audiobooks in general.Twitter: https://twitter.com/ron_clinton
Comment
-
Originally posted by sholloman81 View PostSorry Brian861. Wasn't my intent to offend at all and didn't really consider it from a disability perspective such as blindness. I'm also sure that there a tons of people who love audiobooks and listen to them exclusively rather than reading a physical copy. I guess that I was just trying to make the point that I feel physically reading a book and listening to an audiobook are two different experiences and that I don't really care for audiobooks in general. I'm sure that I could've worded that opinion better. Thanks for the differing perspective and giving me more to think about when it comes to this topic.
In an ironic twist, my wife can't stand to be read to so she and Ron are in the same camp there. She's a Kindle reader as there's no way would we could keep up with her reading physical books nor have the space for them all. The woman has probably read 10,000 books or better.
Comment
-
I think audiobooks are awesome for long road trips. I'm much more alert and resistant to that highway trance that comes with those unending rolling lanes. But I still think that reading words off a printed page is the best way to experience a book. Anything that comes between the written word and the reader can impact the experience. If you have an annoying voice or a bland reader, those words won't hit home the same way the author intended. Audiobooks are still far superior to movie adaptations or *gasp* not reading at all.
That said, I experienced King's 1408 as an audiobook read by King and it was amazing. You can hear it on Blood and Smoke. I read the short story and it paled compared to King's read.
Comment
-
Nothing to see here!Ok, I really can't come up with anymore of these stupid things...
- May 2011
- 8799
Originally posted by Brian861 View Post
No worries. Definitely an overreaction on my part. I've listened to three books while messing around in my library over the last 3 days or so. So, I felt I was killing two birds with one stone. Otherwise, nothing would haven't gotten read during that time.
In an ironic twist, my wife can't stand to be read to so she and Ron are in the same camp there. She's a Kindle reader as there's no way would we could keep up with her reading physical books nor have the space for them all. The woman has probably read 10,000 books or better.
Comment
-
Nothing to see here!Ok, I really can't come up with anymore of these stupid things...
- May 2011
- 8799
Originally posted by jeffingoff View PostI think audiobooks are awesome for long road trips. I'm much more alert and resistant to that highway trance that comes with those unending rolling lanes. But I still think that reading words off a printed page is the best way to experience a book. Anything that comes between the written word and the reader can impact the experience. If you have an annoying voice or a bland reader, those words won't hit home the same way the author intended. Audiobooks are still far superior to movie adaptations or *gasp* not reading at all.
That said, I experienced King's 1408 as an audiobook read by King and it was amazing. You can hear it on Blood and Smoke. I read the short story and it paled compared to King's read.
Comment
-
Interesting discussion on audiobooks vs. physical.
I have never listened to an audio book (as in novel-length), but I do recall listening to something shorter because I could only get the stories in that manner (it was for a Stephen King set of short stories, I want to say it was called Six- something and one of the stories was "In the Death Room"). (Actually, just noticed in the thread that the name was Blood and Smoke)
Expanding the issue a bit, I'm thinking that I could get away with nonfiction, technical stuff on audio, but not necessarily fiction. I've discovered I can read comics digitally, no problem...in fact, because space is starting to become an issue, I prefer sometimes using Comixology instead of print. I even read them on a desktop. However, I have learned I cannot read a book digitally (at least not currently, maybe I'll get used to it). I purchased Robert Iger's memoir as an e-book, started reading it, and just disliked the experience. Knowing the alternative was available just made me want the print version. I tried the e-format because of the pandemic.
I agree with those who say reading and listening are two different things. Reading is the intellect setting its own pace and making decisions in terms of what is important and what can be considered disposable (i.e., what sentences need to be re-read, what points need to be pondered before continuing, and so on). Listening is a more passive intellectual experience, but completely valid on its own, and in one sense, better, because sometimes it is good to simply sit back and listen; it forces one to pay attention and to be quicker about analysis (it also favors those who have a strong vocabulary, thus creating an incentive to have one; I unfortunately do not have a wide lexicon at my disposal, but I do my best). I should point out I have essentially reiterated what others have said here about the differences, but I felt like writing it out in my own words, I guess...Last edited by JJ123; 11-05-2020, 03:10 AM.
Comment
-
Nothing to see here!Ok, I really can't come up with anymore of these stupid things...
- May 2011
- 8799
Originally posted by JJ123 View PostInteresting discussion on audiobooks vs. physical.
I have never listened to an audio book (as in novel-length), but I do recall listening to something shorter because I could only get the stories in that manner (it was for a Stephen King set of short stories, I want to say it was called Six- something and one of the stories was "In the Death Room"). (Actually, just noticed in the thread that the name was Blood and Smoke)
Expanding the issue a bit, I'm thinking that I could get away with nonfiction, technical stuff on audio, but not necessarily fiction. I've discovered I can read comics digitally, no problem...in fact, because space is starting to become an issue, I prefer sometimes using Comixology instead of print. I even read them on a desktop. However, I have learned I cannot read a book digitally (at least not currently, maybe I'll get used to it). I purchased Robert Iger's memoir as an e-book, started reading it, and just disliked the experience. Knowing the alternative was available just made me want the print version. I tried the e-format because of the pandemic.
I agree with those who say reading and listening are two different things. Reading is the intellect setting its own pace and making decisions in terms of what is important and what can be considered disposable (i.e., what sentences need to be re-read, what points need to be pondered before continuing, and so on). Listening is a more passive intellectual experience, but completely valid on its own, and in one sense, better, because sometimes it is good to simply sit back and listen; it forces one to pay attention and to be quicker about analysis (it also favors those who have a strong vocabulary, thus creating an incentive to have one; I unfortunately do not have a wide lexicon at my disposal, but I do my best). I should point out I have essentially reiterated what others have said here about the differences, but I felt like writing it out in my own words, I guess...
On a side note. For those here who would like to try an audio book I have an offer. The offer is for anyone whether they currently have an audible subscription or not. Audible allows subscribers to gift one boo from their personal library to anyone. The book is then owned by the recipient without any commitment. I have over 300 books in my library. If a few people her would like to receive a book from just say so here. I will then create a thread with all my audiobooks listed (Some really good and some real trash). Persons would then be able to PM me with their choice and an email address. I will send the book their way.
- 1 like
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brian861 View Post
I think I'm finally caught up on all mine. If you need more, Brodart is offering covers for 35% off through the 19th.
Comment
Comment