Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Question You Would Ask Stephen King
Collapse
X
-
lol but look at what the movie The Exorcist did for William Blatty. I had never heard of him before; once you see his name in the credits, you think to yourself, this guy wrote a book like this movie?? He must be a great author. But the book isn't really close to the movie at all, but it made Blatty a household name. Or the movie Jaws for Benchley.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dan Hocker View PostNot really a good example.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000175/
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0465588/
Koontz doesn't really have a lot, but King does. But really what it comes down to is personal prefrance. You say Matheson is a better writer than King, but that's your opinion, many others probably think the opposite. I really don't think it has anything to do with the movies tbh. As far as writing the same books over again, that's every author who has published as many books as King. I can't think of anyone who you can't really say that about.
Comment
-
I couldn't think of one movie that did for King what The Exorcist did for William Blatty.
Maybe one: Carrie. And that's going back some 35 years.
Most of the King adaptations didn't translate into a huge box office, nor critical successes. Those that did, most people don't even know were penned by King, like Shawshank and The Green Mile.
No, it's rather the opposite. King's movie adaptations turned many people away from his books. I mean, most were pretty lousy. Many people wouldn't touch a King book because of these crappy movies. Bad movie, bad author. right?
Wrong.
And I really like Richard Matheson. I think he's a great writer.
But could you mention some books of his you think arer better than the best of King?
I'm really curious about this.
sk
Comment
-
Originally posted by frik51 View PostI couldn't think of one movie that did for King what The Exorcist did for William Blatty.
Maybe one: Carrie. And that's going back some 35 years.
Most of the King adaptations didn't translate into a huge box office, nor critical successes. Those that did, most people don't even know were penned by King, like Shawshank and The Green Mile.
No, it's rather the opposite. King's movie adaptations turned many people away from his books. I mean, most were pretty lousy. Many people wouldn't touch a King book because of these crappy movies. Bad movie, bad author. right?
Wrong.
And I really like Richard Matheson. I think he's a great writer.
But could you mention some books of his you think arer better than the best of King?
I'm really curious about this.
sk
Comment
-
I still have to read I Am Legend (been on my TBR list since I found a copy for $1 at Half-Price books) and Hell House, and have heard they are good, but saying I am Legend it is better than King's best is all a matter of opinion. I'm sure plenty of people would agree with you, and plenty would disagree as well. I haven't read anything from Matheson yet, so can't say if he's better or not myself.
Parts of Pet Semetary were actually based on real life for King, including the very close and busy road with tankers often passing by and a near accident involving his son at a very young age, as well as an actual pet cemetery nearby with a sign that had cemetery misspelled. That and more is in his introduction to the book (at least in the pb version I have). You say it's pretty well known he got his early books from rare movies, but I've never read that anywhere myself.
As for the movies based off King's work, a lot of them were very poorly done, so I don't think the movie's have anything to do with his popularity as an author. More that his books do so well people want to make them into movies. You bring up Blatty's name, but in all honestly what is he well known for other than The Exorcist? Elsewhere was a very good story, but other than that and the Exorcist novels I am unaware of anything else he's done in the genre. He has written other books, but they are not the kind of bestsellers that The Exorcist was. Blatty may have been a household name for a while, but not so much today as far as I know. Benchley also didn't have nearly the same success following Jaws, unlike King, who has had success after success. While I don't feel every King book is a masterpiece he is still a reliable author.WARNING!!! WARNING!!! DO NOT VIEW THIS SPOILER! YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!!!
Spoiler!This is a testSpoiler!only a testSpoiler!SeriouslySpoiler!Ok, fineSpoiler!It's more than thatSpoiler!Or maybe it really is just a testSpoiler!to see how farSpoiler!you are willing to goSpoiler!to see what I say at the endSpoiler!of this very longSpoiler!and pointless signatureSpoiler!you must really want to knowSpoiler!what is so importantSpoiler!that I had toSpoiler!bury itSpoiler!in all these spoiler tagsSpoiler!Nosy little fucker, aren't you?
Comment
-
Originally posted by theenormityofitall View PostI Am Legend surpasses anything ever written by King
Comment
-
Yes, it's a matter of opinion, but I was asked what novels I thought were better than King's, so I listed a few. I did forget to say I thought Misery was excellent (WAY better than the movie which is saying something since the movie was pretty good) as was The Dark Half. But I only mentioned Blatty because of what the movie did for his career...it made him famous, when I think before it ever came out, Blatty was not well known at all. I never thought he was equal to King nor was Benchley. It's hard for me to actually get into novels because I keep telling myself: "This is not real, so why am I reading it?"...but a movie is different of course, because it's visual. 99% of the books I read are non-fiction and have said before on this forum that I've never even read any of the Dark Tower books, I was just lucky and I had the opportunity to buy the last three as limited editions, along with LSOE and others. It's mainly all about collecting for me. Anyway, I never thought King was a bad author; he's written some great books, I just think he's overrated, that's all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by theenormityofitall View PostYes, it's a matter of opinion, but I was asked what novels I thought were better than King's, so I listed a few. I did forget to say I thought Misery was excellent (WAY better than the movie which is saying something since the movie was pretty good) I've never even read any of the Dark Tower books, I was just lucky and I had the opportunity to buy the last three as limited editions, along with LSOE and others. It's mainly all about collecting for me. Anyway, I never thought King was a bad author; he's written some great books, I just think he's overrated, that's all.
sk
Comment
-
Originally posted by theenormityofitall View PostYes, it's a matter of opinion, but I was asked what novels I thought were better than King's, so I listed a few. I did forget to say I thought Misery was excellent (WAY better than the movie which is saying something since the movie was pretty good) as was The Dark Half. But I only mentioned Blatty because of what the movie did for his career...it made him famous, when I think before it ever came out, Blatty was not well known at all. I never thought he was equal to King nor was Benchley. It's hard for me to actually get into novels because I keep telling myself: "This is not real, so why am I reading it?"...but a movie is different of course, because it's visual. 99% of the books I read are non-fiction and have said before on this forum that I've never even read any of the Dark Tower books, I was just lucky and I had the opportunity to buy the last three as limited editions, along with LSOE and others. It's mainly all about collecting for me. Anyway, I never thought King was a bad author; he's written some great books, I just think he's overrated, that's all.
Comment
Comment