[INDEXED]The Century's Best Horror Fiction

[theenormityofitall]

This is a pretty old project, we're trying to catch up on. I'm not sure where we're at with the project. I am pretty sure the project was before we where sending out all the email announcements.

OK. Maybe I'll find it on the secondary market one of these days.
I wish this forum was never started! It made me very interested in buying books again and I'm broke because of it.
Naw, I love the forum but it really did destroy me financially

[RJK1981]

I figured as much, but I'm just excited for what December holds!

As am I, though mainly for IT and the Horror Hall of Fame. This one sounds great too, but will have to pick it up at a later time

[bsaenz24]

It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......

I know that still means several weeks, but....


It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......It's on the Coming Soon page.......

[Brian James Freeman]

We're hoping for the end of December or very early January -- this is a BIG printing job!

Brian

[bsaenz24]

Between the weight of these books at IT, you guys had better be careful!! I don't want anybody throwing their backs out!!

[frik51]

We're hoping for the end of December or very early January -- this is a BIG printing job!

Brian

And the lettereds, Brian??

sk

[theenormityofitall]

Oh man I got an email for this thing but couldn't get it!! It's just like those nitwits at SS and not being able to get the limited of 11/22/63 today. Now it's supposed to be available on the 10th. The hell with it.

[JasonUK]

I seem to recall when this project was first announced that the stated intention was to have all the stories from the odd numbered years in one volume and the evens in the other, so that there was a split of old and new in each book. It appears now the stories from 1901-1950 are in one book and 1951-2000 in the other. Any particular reason for this change, or am I mis-remembering?

Thanks, Jason

[Brian James Freeman]

And the lettereds, Brian??

sk

In line with the rest of the lettered editions that need traycases. We should be able to make good progress on that list in 2012, but it is an unfortunately long list!

Brian

[Brian James Freeman]

I seem to recall when this project was first announced that the stated intention was to have all the stories from the odd numbered years in one volume and the evens in the other, so that there was a split of old and new in each book. It appears now the stories from 1901-1950 are in one book and 1951-2000 in the other. Any particular reason for this change, or am I mis-remembering?

Thanks, Jason

You remember correctly! We mentioned this years ago, but we changed it fairly early on in the project based on feedback from readers. These are going to be *big* books, and the idea of having to flip from book to book to read the stories in order was not desirable to everyone we heard from.

Brian

[Martin]

I have the same memory about the odd and even years. I also did not realize the books are not set up that way.

I seem to recall when this project was first announced that the stated intention was to have all the stories from the odd numbered years in one volume and the evens in the other, so that there was a split of old and new in each book. It appears now the stories from 1901-1950 are in one book and 1951-2000 in the other. Any particular reason for this change, or am I mis-remembering?

Thanks, Jason

[bsaenz24]

Very good decision to switch to sequential rather than odd vs even. That was Kate's idea, wasn't it??? Come on. Confess!!

[Dan Hocker]

Huh, I didn't even know it was ever supposed to be "non-sequential". Makes much more sense this way.

[Brian James Freeman]

Huh, I didn't even know it was ever supposed to be "non-sequential". Makes much more sense this way.

You were 14 years old at the time.

Brian

[Martin]

If I remember correctly, early on you could purchase just one of the editions rather than the set. When that was the case I think it had to be split.