Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bookplates: Yes or No??
Collapse
X
-
Oh I totally agree, just didn't want anyone to have the allusion that the authors actually held and signed you books. They held and signed the signature page, just not the whole book.
-
Originally posted by Dan Hocker View PostNot to burst your bubble but, there's not a lot of difference between a signed author book plate and a sig sheet in a signed limited. The author never actually had the book in his hands, he had a stack of sig sheets that where then bound into the book by the printer.
Yes, but Dan, a book plate is a STICKER!!!!!
Seriously though, thou shalt not use bookplates!! I see a signature page as a normal and intended part of the book. Bookplates == BAD!!!!! REDRUM!!! REDRUM!!! REDRUM!!!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Dan Hocker View PostNot to burst your bubble but, there's not a lot of difference between a signed author book plate and a sig sheet in a signed limited. The author never actually had the book in his hands, he had a stack of sig sheets that where then bound into the book by the printer.
.. . . and like Grant said, it looks better too.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Grant Wootton View Post(2) an author bookplate doesn't have the same personal "wow the author's touched this very book that I'm holding" that a flat signed or signed limited has
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedAgain, not a fan Jan, the only author bookplates I have in the collection are some of the Hodder & Stoughton UK Limited of King's (some real signature, some facsimile) - either way, they're not great, for two reasons ... (1) most of them appear to have been stuck into the book by 5 year olds with access to way too much glue and (2) an author bookplate doesn't have the same personal "wow the author's touched this very book that I'm holding" that a flat signed or signed limited has
Leave a comment:
-
It's upsetting when I find a collectable with a non-author related bookplate, ink stamp or writing in it. I'd only buy it as a low-priced reading copy.
I haven't seen the practice used lately, but how do you feel about a author's signature bookplate?
Jan
Leave a comment:
-
Unless it was owned by someone famous then you could hit the mother load.
Leave a comment:
-
If a book has a bookplate I will only buy it if I really need to add it to my collection and the price is low.
Leave a comment:
-
I agree with Grant. If a book has a bookplate attached, it's an automatic no-sale to me. It's simply defacing the book permanently.
John
Leave a comment:
-
Really? That much? Crazy. I thought they'd ever so slightly increase the value. but i still didnt like them anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
I hate book plates.My wifes grandmother ruined the value of all her books.After she died we were going through her books book plates were in first editions of C.S. Lewis Screwtape Letters all first editions of every James A.Michener book and a first edition copy of All Quiet on the Western Front.We were told by a book seller that the book plates probably lowered the value by 70% or more.So a big no to book plates for me.
Leave a comment:
-
Took a look at my PS again and it does have the book plate in it, but no name. But its in the bottom left corner of the front endpaper--most of it's hidden by the frontflap of the DJ. I find even that placement to be odd.
Leave a comment:
-
Guest repliedNot a fan of bookplates at all, just the overall look does it for me and, like Squire, I've requested refunds if a book I purchased arrived with a previous owners plate in it (if it were advertised as bookplated, I'd not consider it for inclusion in my collection - unless the plate belonged to someone I'd heard of - ie, should I see an SK 1st edition bookplated by DRK, I'd think about it)Last edited by Grant Wootton; 02-20-2012, 12:51 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
For what it's worth I greatly dislike bookplates. To me they look like the folks who put stickers all over their laptops. It's just not my thing.
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: