Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bookplates: Yes or No??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dan Hocker
    replied
    Oh I totally agree, just didn't want anyone to have the allusion that the authors actually held and signed you books. They held and signed the signature page, just not the whole book.

    Leave a comment:


  • bsaenz24
    replied
    Originally posted by Dan Hocker View Post
    Not to burst your bubble but, there's not a lot of difference between a signed author book plate and a sig sheet in a signed limited. The author never actually had the book in his hands, he had a stack of sig sheets that where then bound into the book by the printer.

    Yes, but Dan, a book plate is a STICKER!!!!!

    Seriously though, thou shalt not use bookplates!! I see a signature page as a normal and intended part of the book. Bookplates == BAD!!!!! REDRUM!!! REDRUM!!! REDRUM!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • JDar.
    replied
    Originally posted by Dan Hocker View Post
    Not to burst your bubble but, there's not a lot of difference between a signed author book plate and a sig sheet in a signed limited. The author never actually had the book in his hands, he had a stack of sig sheets that where then bound into the book by the printer.
    A few years ago a few people (not the authors) were selling signed bookplates on eBay. Poppy Z Brite noticed her's was being sold and quickly posted on Message Boards and her blog that she had never signed a bookplate in her life. Soooo, one major diff between a bookplate and a signature sheet is that I feel more confident in the authenticity of the signature if it's bound into the book by the publisher.

    .. . . and like Grant said, it looks better too.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan Hocker
    replied
    Originally posted by Grant Wootton View Post
    (2) an author bookplate doesn't have the same personal "wow the author's touched this very book that I'm holding" that a flat signed or signed limited has
    Not to burst your bubble but, there's not a lot of difference between a signed author book plate and a sig sheet in a signed limited. The author never actually had the book in his hands, he had a stack of sig sheets that where then bound into the book by the printer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Again, not a fan Jan, the only author bookplates I have in the collection are some of the Hodder & Stoughton UK Limited of King's (some real signature, some facsimile) - either way, they're not great, for two reasons ... (1) most of them appear to have been stuck into the book by 5 year olds with access to way too much glue and (2) an author bookplate doesn't have the same personal "wow the author's touched this very book that I'm holding" that a flat signed or signed limited has

    Leave a comment:


  • srboone
    replied
    I don't know; I don't have any, but Michael Moorcock (one of my favorite authors) signs most of his stuff these days by bookplate (they're free for the asking.)

    Up to now, I've kinda turned my nose up at them....
    Last edited by srboone; 02-21-2012, 11:49 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • JDar.
    replied
    It's upsetting when I find a collectable with a non-author related bookplate, ink stamp or writing in it. I'd only buy it as a low-priced reading copy.

    I haven't seen the practice used lately, but how do you feel about a author's signature bookplate?

    Jan

    Leave a comment:


  • bookworm 1
    replied
    Unless it was owned by someone famous then you could hit the mother load.

    Leave a comment:


  • Martin
    replied
    If a book has a bookplate I will only buy it if I really need to add it to my collection and the price is low.

    Leave a comment:


  • jhanic
    replied
    I agree with Grant. If a book has a bookplate attached, it's an automatic no-sale to me. It's simply defacing the book permanently.

    John

    Leave a comment:


  • Teriw
    replied
    Really? That much? Crazy. I thought they'd ever so slightly increase the value. but i still didnt like them anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • bookworm 1
    replied
    I hate book plates.My wifes grandmother ruined the value of all her books.After she died we were going through her books book plates were in first editions of C.S. Lewis Screwtape Letters all first editions of every James A.Michener book and a first edition copy of All Quiet on the Western Front.We were told by a book seller that the book plates probably lowered the value by 70% or more.So a big no to book plates for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • srboone
    replied
    Took a look at my PS again and it does have the book plate in it, but no name. But its in the bottom left corner of the front endpaper--most of it's hidden by the frontflap of the DJ. I find even that placement to be odd.

    Leave a comment:


  • Guest's Avatar
    Guest replied
    Not a fan of bookplates at all, just the overall look does it for me and, like Squire, I've requested refunds if a book I purchased arrived with a previous owners plate in it (if it were advertised as bookplated, I'd not consider it for inclusion in my collection - unless the plate belonged to someone I'd heard of - ie, should I see an SK 1st edition bookplated by DRK, I'd think about it)
    Last edited by Grant Wootton; 02-20-2012, 12:51 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben Staad
    replied
    For what it's worth I greatly dislike bookplates. To me they look like the folks who put stickers all over their laptops. It's just not my thing.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X